Nous ne pouvons afficher que des informations limitées pour ce cabinet. Nous affichons des informations plus complètes pour les cabinets suivants :
Gustavo Binenbojm & Associados (GBA) 'stands out for its combination of excellence in service' and 'technical competence of the team', which excels in judicial and administrative proceedings involving constitutional, administrative and regulatory law. The group has extensive experience in matters heard before the Supreme Court, with an emphasis on cases concerning freedom of speech, free competition, and constitutional economic law. Clients from the transport, TMT, energy, healthcare and insurance sectors regularly turn to the group, which is led by name partner Gustavo Binenbojm. Other key individuals include administrative law specialists André Cyrino, Alice Voronoff and Rafael Koatz.
L’éditorial du Legal 500
Témoignages
Collectés indépendamment par l'équipe de recherche du Legal 500.
‘The firm stands out for its combination of excellence in service, technical competence of the team, advanced technology, innovation and interdisciplinary collaboration. Responds quickly and clearly, bringing a lot of security in actions.'
‘Francisco Defanti is a professional who stands out for the quality of the services provided, clarity and objectivity in consultations as well as the agility in responses, in addition to perfect performance in administrative and judicial processes for which he is responsible.'
Clients clés
- Organizações Globo S.A.
- Associação Brasileira de Concessionárias de Rodovias – ABCR
Points forts
- Represents Globo in a constitutional complaint with a preliminary injunction before the Brazilian Supreme Court, intending to suspend the decision that prohibited the exhibition of a true-crime journalistic TV programme, Linha Direta, that would discuss the tragic murder of the 4-year-old boy Henry Borel Medeiros.
- Acts on behalf of FENASAÚDE, an entity that congregates and represents the companies that operate healthcare plans, as an amicus curiae in several “repeated” appeals before the STJ.