Nous ne pouvons afficher que des informations limitées pour ce cabinet. Nous affichons des informations plus complètes pour les cabinets suivants :

Garrigues offers a full-service litigation practice, advising on administrative, commercial, real estate and constitutional disputes. Engaged by clients from the electricity, education and sports industries, the department is co-led by seasoned litigator Hugo Forno Flórez, who covers contractual cases and dispute prevention, and Melissa Nuñez Santti, whose broad portfolio of work includes civil and construction-related litigation. Principal associates Javier Bueno Zúñiga and Javier Jimeno Goicochea are well-regarded team members: Bueno defends clients against government entities in cases relating to the imposition of fines and sanctions, and Jimeno covers infrastructure-related proceedings. At the associate level, Jose Vera Uturunco represents telecoms and security company clients, and Kevin Villanueva is active in commercial and insurance cases.
L’éditorial du Legal 500

Témoignages

Collectés indépendamment par l'équipe de recherche du Legal 500.

  • ‘I consider that the team possesses solid knowledge in the field, and they also know how to exactly identify the interests and objectives of the client.'

  • ‘The plus that makes the firm's lawyers stand out is that they are not complacent with the legal strategies to apply in each case; That is to say, although they have the legal basis or strategy that any recognised lawyer or law firm with great experience and professional experience would provide, they always seek to contribute with some innovative strategy within the legal scope or framework, based on national regulations or jurisprudence, and international.'

Clients clés

  • Fondo de Inversión en Rentas de Bienes Inmuebles Sura Asset Management II
  • Productos Roche QF

Points forts

  • Representing Firbi in a complete legal strategy that involves an eviction, the enforcement of a contract, and a claim for damages.
  • Defending Telefonica in a case regarding the violation of the constitutional right of due process, through the application of a non-ordinary remedy referred to as the ‘restrain of unconstitutional homogeneous acts’.